Christians everywhere, should be aware of the fact, that the protestant churches came about, as a result of the people who took exception, to the power the Pope was exercising over all of Christianity.
From the scriptures they determined that he had no such authority, and

another group of Christians was spawned, calling themselves protestants

with their many denominations.

What they failed to do centuries past, was to thoroughly examine where Christianity originated. The Hebrew scriptures ( the new covenant writings ) was very skilfully edited, to promote a single spokes person, to whom they attached the title Pope. they called it the Textus Receptus/received texts

Question : Received from whom?

These are the same people who tell us the New Testament was inspired in the Greek language.

If that was the case, how do we explain the existence of the Aramaic version of the New Testament?  the language that was spoken in the Holy Land in the messiah’s day.

The word or name “POPE ” cannot be found written anywhere in the New Covenant writings.( your new testament.)  The Bible.

That should have been a great big RED FLAG to the people who were in opposition to the Pope, but it was not.

Now, let us first look at the name Christian. From Strong’s concordance we learn, it is written in the book of acts 26:28 and 1 Peter:4:16. It can also be found in Acts 11:26 in its plural form.

Here we must ask the first pointed question, why is the name Christian not found in the Gospels? since that is the place where we first find the name Christ. Every bible student or scholar knows that the name Christ or Jesus Christ is not written anywhere in the first’covenant writings ( Old Testament) So then, who is this person, we find in the new covenant writings (New Testament)  with the name Jesus Christ.

That question demands not only an answer, but a detailed one, since All of Christianity looks forward to their future from Jesus Christ.

( No Jesus Christ )    (no future)

Time to consult the old covenant writings to determine from the scriptures the name of the messiah, especially, since the Prophet Isaiah  in chapter 52 and verse 6, tells us that the creator says, “ My people shall know my name”  first part of that verse. Since the scriptures assure us that his people would know his name, then let us once again consult the Hebrew scriptures to find the messiahs name.

From the prophet Isaiah comes the answer:  From the KJV first and then the ISR.
Isaiah 7:14. Therefore The Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Emmanu’el.
The ISR reads; Therefore YHVH Himself gives you a sign ‘alma’/a virgin conceives and gives birth to a son and shall call his name Emmanu’el.

There we have the answer, from two different translations of the Hebrew Scriptures.
The name of the child that was to be born of the virgin woman would be called Emmanu’el. ————-By his Mother.————                      

Yet, when we turn to the new covenant / New Testament writings, we find the name Jesus.

Note: there is no ‘J’ sound or ‘J’ equivalent letter in the Hebrew language. The name Jesus is not a Hebrew name.
That then, makes it impossible for a Hebrew Child born in the first century AD/CE
to be given the name JESUS.
P.S. There was no ‘J’ letter in the English Language when the first copy of the 1611 translation of the King James/Iames bible rolled off the press.

At this juncture, we must ask, who is responsible for this radical altering of the scriptures in such a reckless manner? The scriptures clearly say MY PEOPLE shall know my name. Isaiah 52 and verse 6

The children of Israel looking forward to their messiah would be expecting Immanu’el not ( Jesus, nor Jesus Christ )

Now to the new covenant writings, where we can see, how the people who tampered with the inspired words of the almighty, totally ignored the warning from proverbs 30 and verse 6 which says; add not unto his words lest he reprove thee and thou be found a liar.

And now for the proof, that they lied: In the gospel of Matthew chapter 1 and verse 22; we read the following:

Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of by the Lord by the prophet saying ,  

Behold a virgin will be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and (they) shall call his name Emmanu’el which being interpreted, is God/Elohim with us. we learn from that passage of scripture, that first a prophecy of scripture was fulfilled and that /Emmanu’el God himself would be that child.   Verse 23 KJV

Verse 20 through 21 is where we find a most profound lie, purposefully placed within the pages of the new testament. (A lie of astronomical ramifications) the reason being, all of Christianity worships JESUS.

Verse twenty tells us an angel of the Lord appeared unto Joseph to inform him that Mary’s pregnancy was the workings of the Holy Spirit. which appears to be perfectly normal. However! in verse 21 the angel in this dream,  tells Joseph to call the child  JESUS, not Emmanu’el.

The  ISR translation places the name Yahshua instead of Jesus, in that passage. Either way It is impossible for an Angel to bring any other name than Emmanu’el, for That would constitute a lie. YHVH in Isaiah 7 and verse 14 gave the name Emmanu’el, and Hebrews 6:18 Tells us it is Impossible for the the Creator/Emmanu’el YHVH/God to lie.

This was a Hebrew event in the land of the Hebrew people.

No one in the world knew of any English people in the first century.

Secondly that is a lie, because the scripture from Isaiah say’s, the Lord himself (GOD)  would be that child bearing the NAME Emmanu’el.

Note: The English translators in the gospel renders the name Emmanu’el, GOD with us.

Above from the prophet Isaiah we learn that the child born of a virgin would be called Emmanu’el by his mother.  (and shall call his name Emmanu’el the English translators added the  word( they) (they shall call his name Emmanu’el. to that passage .  More lies.

Note: There is no prophecy of scripture in the Old testament which speaks of anyone receiving instructions from any angel, contrary to the words spoken to the prophet Isaiah.

The reason we can emphatically call them lies, is because the Holy spirit which inspired the prophet Isaiah, also inspired the gospel writer.

The same lie can be found in the gospel of Luke chapter 1 and verse 31 which reads as follows: And behold thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. The prophet Isaiah wroteEmmanu ‘el.     (Not Jesus.)

Comment:  The people responsible for tampering with the scriptures is responsible for the lying passage which does not represent any prophecy of scripture that can be found in the Old covenant writings/Old testament.

Now for the word Christianity.

In Acts 11:25- 26 we find the following words written:

Then departed Barnabas to Tarsus, for to seek Saul/Sha’ul:

and when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.  Verse 26

NOTE:  Keep in mind the word ( first ) ——-in that passage.

Here  once again we find another fraudulent sentence strategically placed at the end of verse 26 which reads : And the disciples were called Christians FIRST in Antioch. That sentence is irrelevant  to Saul and Barnabas teaching the Nazarenes/Church, this incident occurred long after the Messiah departed and also long after Sha’ul/Paul was called into the work many many years later.

More proof: In Acts 24 we find Turtullus accusing Saul/Sha’ul in verse 5 of being a pestilent fellow, accusing him of being, the ring leader of the sect of the NAZARENES,  NOT THE CHRISTIANS.

Note: No scripture supports the name Christians. No group has any authority to change the name Nazarene to Christian.

Emmanu’el according to the scriptures, Matthew 2:23  was to be called a Nazarene, no small wonder the first century congregation was known  as the Sect of the Nazarenes. During the messiah’s ministry, the disciples were called Nazarenes at least three and a half years before  the days of the Apostles. Not Christians.  THAT FRAUDULENT SENTENCE SAYS, THEY WERE CALLED Christians  ” FIRST ” in Antioch.

Question : Why and by whose authority?

Note: the word “first” in Antioch. From that fraudulent sentence, we learn, that the messiah was never called Christ, nor his disciples Christians during “HIS” ministry.

In summary; The scriptures does not support any prophecy bearing the name Jesus nor Jesus Christ.

Conclusion !  There is no Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the scriptures support only Emmanu’el, the Nazarene. From Nazaretth. 

Neither is there a Jesus Christ in history. I challenge anyone who reads this article to find a person called Jesus in the first century living in the holy land and show it to me, and all the people on the internet, who visit this site.

Your Bible says there is only one name GIVEN UNDER HEAVEN, BY WHICH WE CAN BE SAVED.  Acts  4:12

QUESTION :  Which name is it      Emmanu’el  or JESUS

ISR : Institute for Scripture Research.

KJV : King James version

        Don’t forget part 2 — and article 25    “And they shall all be taught of YHVH”